Tweet
So I’ve been messing around with iGaming ads lately and one thing that kept bugging me was this whole debate about native ads versus display ads. Everyone seems to have their own opinion on which works better for getting new players. I figured I’d share my experience and maybe hear what others think too.
At first, I honestly thought ads were just ads. You put them up, people either click or they don’t, right? But once I started spending actual money on campaigns, I realized not all ads pull in players the same way. Some feel like they blend into the content and others just scream “banner” at the top of a site. And trust me, that difference really matters when you’re paying for clicks.
Here’s where the pain kicks in. With display ads, I felt like I was shouting into a crowd. My banners were all over gaming news sites and apps, but the engagement was pretty weak. People would see them but barely anyone clicked. It made me feel like I was wasting money and time. Sure, they gave me impressions, but what’s the point if those impressions don’t turn into real signups?
Then I tried native ads. These were designed to look like part of the content, almost like suggested posts or articles. And wow, the difference was noticeable. Instead of ignoring them, people actually engaged. I think it’s because native ads don’t feel like an interruption. They’re part of the flow, and that makes players more likely to check them out.
Now, I don’t want to make it sound like native ads are perfect. They take more work to design because you have to think about the context. If it doesn’t match the tone of the platform, people see right through it. Plus, clicks can still be unpredictable depending on the audience. But compared to display ads, the conversion rate looked much better in my case.
Here’s my personal insight. If you just want eyeballs and brand recognition, display ads might still have a place. They’re loud, clear, and you know exactly what you’re getting. But if the goal is player acquisition, meaning real signups and activity, native ads felt way more worth the money for me.
A little tip I picked up is to test both side by side. Don’t just go all in on one without comparing. I set small budgets for each and tracked where actual signups were coming from. That gave me a clearer picture instead of just going with gut feeling. Numbers don’t lie, and sometimes the results surprise you.
I’m not pretending to be an expert here, just someone who tried both and learned the hard way. For anyone else stuck in the same debate, I’d say don’t get too hung up on the hype. Test what works for your specific audience. What worked for me might not work for you.
If you’re curious and want a deeper breakdown of the pros and cons, I found this Guide to iGaming Ads super helpful. It explains the details way better than I can here.
At the end of the day, the biggest lesson I learned is that ads are not one-size-fits-all. Native gave me better conversions, display gave me more reach, and both taught me something about how players interact online. So if you’re stuck choosing, maybe try both like I did. You might find your own sweet spot.
Would love to know if anyone else here had similar experiences. Did native ads feel more trustworthy to your audience too, or did display ads still pull better results for you? Always curious how others see it.
