Tweet
I’ve been thinking about this a lot lately, so I figured I’d throw it out here and see if anyone else has gone through the same thing. When you’re dealing with Dating Marketing, it sometimes feels like half the work isn’t even about getting traffic or running ads—it’s about figuring out what’s real and what’s just noise. I didn’t expect that part to be so draining when I first got into it.
For me, the whole confusion started when I noticed my numbers looking great on the surface—tons of leads coming in, decent clicks, decent sign-ups. But something felt off. The conversions weren’t following the usual pattern, and the user behavior just didn’t make sense. It’s like when someone appears interested but never replies again; you can’t help but feel something weird is happening in the background.
The more I looked at it, the more I realized the obvious: fraud exists everywhere, and Dating Marketing isn’t exactly immune to it. At first, I honestly thought it was my funnel design or my landing pages messing up. I tweaked things like crazy—changed copy, simplified forms, swapped creatives—but nothing really changed. That’s when I started questioning whether the problem was on my end at all.
The real pain point hit me when I was paying for leads that weren’t even close to real people. Bots, duplicate sign-ups, weird patterns that made no human sense—it was all showing up in my stats. I used to think fraud was something only big companies had to deal with. Turns out, even small campaigns get hit just as hard.
I tested a few things myself just to see if the issue would calm down. First thing I tried was tightening my traffic sources. I stopped running campaigns on every platform that claimed to have “great dating audiences” and instead focused on two or three places I felt I had better control over. It didn’t fully solve the problem, but it definitely cut down a chunk of the strange activity.
Another thing that helped was looking at behavior metrics rather than just lead volume. I used to judge campaigns based on how many sign-ups I was getting. Now I check how long they stay on the page, what they click, whether they actually finish the funnel, and how they behave after signing up. Once I started doing that, I began noticing which sources were giving me real users and which ones were just stuffing my numbers.
Some people in other threads suggested adding simple verification steps. I tried that too, but lightly. I didn’t want to make the signup process annoying. A small addition—like confirming an email or adding a small delay page—actually filtered out the weird bots without hurting real conversions too much. I was surprised by how much of a difference a tiny friction point made.
Around this time, I also stumbled upon an article that breaks down some practical fixes and checks. Sharing it here because it matched what I experienced, especially the part about reviewing patterns instead of staring at large numbers: Reduce Fraud in Dating Marketing. It’s nothing fancy, but it helped me understand the behavior side a bit better.
One thing I still struggle with is knowing which platforms are genuinely clean. Some days it feels like traffic quality just swings wildly for no reason. I’ve learned not to panic over spikes or dips and instead watch for repeat behavior over a couple of weeks. If a source keeps giving me users who drop off instantly, I stop using it. It’s simple, but it saved me a lot of wasted budget.
Another small insight that helped: keep your forms short but not too short. I used to think fewer fields meant more sign-ups (and yeah, it does), but it also leaves the door wide open for junk. When I added one or two light but meaningful fields—like asking a user preference—it helped filter out the automated junk without scaring real people away.
At the end of the day, what worked for me wasn’t one big “solution,” but a mix of small things. Watching patterns, tightening sources, adding tiny friction points, and not assuming every lead is a good lead. It’s still not perfect, but the lead quality has definitely improved, and the fraud noise is way less than it used to be.
I’m still learning, so I’d love to hear what others are doing. But if you’ve been confused about weird leads or strange spikes, just know you’re not the only one dealing with it in Dating Marketing. A bit of testing and a lot of observation goes a long way.
For me, the whole confusion started when I noticed my numbers looking great on the surface—tons of leads coming in, decent clicks, decent sign-ups. But something felt off. The conversions weren’t following the usual pattern, and the user behavior just didn’t make sense. It’s like when someone appears interested but never replies again; you can’t help but feel something weird is happening in the background.
The more I looked at it, the more I realized the obvious: fraud exists everywhere, and Dating Marketing isn’t exactly immune to it. At first, I honestly thought it was my funnel design or my landing pages messing up. I tweaked things like crazy—changed copy, simplified forms, swapped creatives—but nothing really changed. That’s when I started questioning whether the problem was on my end at all.
The real pain point hit me when I was paying for leads that weren’t even close to real people. Bots, duplicate sign-ups, weird patterns that made no human sense—it was all showing up in my stats. I used to think fraud was something only big companies had to deal with. Turns out, even small campaigns get hit just as hard.
I tested a few things myself just to see if the issue would calm down. First thing I tried was tightening my traffic sources. I stopped running campaigns on every platform that claimed to have “great dating audiences” and instead focused on two or three places I felt I had better control over. It didn’t fully solve the problem, but it definitely cut down a chunk of the strange activity.
Another thing that helped was looking at behavior metrics rather than just lead volume. I used to judge campaigns based on how many sign-ups I was getting. Now I check how long they stay on the page, what they click, whether they actually finish the funnel, and how they behave after signing up. Once I started doing that, I began noticing which sources were giving me real users and which ones were just stuffing my numbers.
Some people in other threads suggested adding simple verification steps. I tried that too, but lightly. I didn’t want to make the signup process annoying. A small addition—like confirming an email or adding a small delay page—actually filtered out the weird bots without hurting real conversions too much. I was surprised by how much of a difference a tiny friction point made.
Around this time, I also stumbled upon an article that breaks down some practical fixes and checks. Sharing it here because it matched what I experienced, especially the part about reviewing patterns instead of staring at large numbers: Reduce Fraud in Dating Marketing. It’s nothing fancy, but it helped me understand the behavior side a bit better.
One thing I still struggle with is knowing which platforms are genuinely clean. Some days it feels like traffic quality just swings wildly for no reason. I’ve learned not to panic over spikes or dips and instead watch for repeat behavior over a couple of weeks. If a source keeps giving me users who drop off instantly, I stop using it. It’s simple, but it saved me a lot of wasted budget.
Another small insight that helped: keep your forms short but not too short. I used to think fewer fields meant more sign-ups (and yeah, it does), but it also leaves the door wide open for junk. When I added one or two light but meaningful fields—like asking a user preference—it helped filter out the automated junk without scaring real people away.
At the end of the day, what worked for me wasn’t one big “solution,” but a mix of small things. Watching patterns, tightening sources, adding tiny friction points, and not assuming every lead is a good lead. It’s still not perfect, but the lead quality has definitely improved, and the fraud noise is way less than it used to be.
I’m still learning, so I’d love to hear what others are doing. But if you’ve been confused about weird leads or strange spikes, just know you’re not the only one dealing with it in Dating Marketing. A bit of testing and a lot of observation goes a long way.
