Tweet
I’ve been buying dating traffic for a while, and one thing that took me much longer than it should have is figuring out how to tell the difference between premium users and people who just click out of curiosity. When you’re trying to buy dating traffic that actually converts, this can make or break your campaign budget.
At first, I assumed that if traffic was cheap and flowing, it was good. I mean, who doesn’t like seeing a campaign get tons of clicks overnight? The problem is that clicks don’t always equal results. I went through months of mixed outcomes before I realised that the quality of traffic matters far more than the quantity. A common challenge
When I started, every campaign looked the same to me. If the traffic was coming in, I believed it would eventually convert. But as many others here have experienced, I ended up with campaigns that had plenty of clicks, no purchases, no sign-ups, no meaningful progress. I kept tweaking landing pages, creatives, CTAs, even the offer payout, thinking something was off on my end.
Only later did I realise that I wasn’t dealing with a campaign issue – I was dealing with a traffic problem.
If the users coming in don’t have the intention to register, download, or complete the next step, nothing you do on the funnel will magically turn them into buyers. And if the traffic is too low-intent, it can actually mislead your optimisation because it skews your data and slows down testing. What I noticed when analysing different traffic types
I started paying attention to signals instead of just surface numbers. I compared campaigns that sent thousands of clicks with low conversion vs campaigns with fewer clicks but higher user engagement. A few things stood out to me:
Premium traffic usually behaves differently:
Meanwhile, low-intent traffic shows the opposite:
I also noticed that some traffic sources are simply built for volume, not quality. They send users who click accidentally, have no interest, or are just flipping through ads. Cheap traffic looks attractive until you realise it never pays you back. The painful learning phase
I had campaigns where people came in and bounced within three seconds. I changed the headline, changed the CTA, made the landing page shorter, made it longer, tried different images – none of it helped. That’s when it hit me: I was optimising the wrong part of the puzzle.
Someone told me once, “You can’t polish low-intent traffic and turn it into buyers.” And they were right. No amount of funnel tweaking can save a campaign where the audience simply doesn’t care. What finally helped
So, I changed how I approached testing. Instead of focusing on cost per click, I started thinking in terms of cost per quality user. You’d be surprised how different those numbers look. A more expensive click from a highly interested user ends up being much cheaper in the long run because the campaign doesn’t keep draining budget endlessly.
I also spent time reading and comparing insights from people who had gone through the same thing. One resource that helped me understand the difference in a more structured way was this post:
Spot Premium vs Low-Intent Traffic to Promote Dating Offers
It doesn’t magically solve the problem, but it helped confirm what I was already noticing based on my results: the source matters just as much as the offer, if not more. Signals I look for now
Nothing scientific – just practical habits I’ve built over time:
1. Early engagement metrics
If 80% of users leave before three seconds, I already know something is wrong with the traffic source, not necessarily the funnel.
2. Repeated clicks from the same user
Returning visitors usually mean real interest. Premium traffic tends to have more of these.
3. Conversion-assisted events
Even if they don’t buy immediately, high-intent users usually do things like scroll deep, interact with buttons, or start a sign-up process.
4. Placement transparency
I now prefer sources that tell me where the traffic is coming from. Blind sources often send junk I can’t evaluate.
5. Gradual scale instead of instant bursts
If a campaign suddenly floods with traffic the second I start it, I get cautious. Quality traffic usually builds at a normal pace, not in chaotic spikes. Not perfect, but better
Even now, I still get campaigns where the quality feels mixed. But I’m burning less budget and getting more consistent results because I’m not chasing raw click volume anymore.
If anyone here is struggling with dating campaigns that feel like they should be converting but aren’t, I’d seriously recommend stepping back and analysing:
Is it the funnel, or is it the audience?
From my experience, nine times out of ten, it was the traffic – not the offer – holding things back.
At first, I assumed that if traffic was cheap and flowing, it was good. I mean, who doesn’t like seeing a campaign get tons of clicks overnight? The problem is that clicks don’t always equal results. I went through months of mixed outcomes before I realised that the quality of traffic matters far more than the quantity. A common challenge
When I started, every campaign looked the same to me. If the traffic was coming in, I believed it would eventually convert. But as many others here have experienced, I ended up with campaigns that had plenty of clicks, no purchases, no sign-ups, no meaningful progress. I kept tweaking landing pages, creatives, CTAs, even the offer payout, thinking something was off on my end.
Only later did I realise that I wasn’t dealing with a campaign issue – I was dealing with a traffic problem.
If the users coming in don’t have the intention to register, download, or complete the next step, nothing you do on the funnel will magically turn them into buyers. And if the traffic is too low-intent, it can actually mislead your optimisation because it skews your data and slows down testing. What I noticed when analysing different traffic types
I started paying attention to signals instead of just surface numbers. I compared campaigns that sent thousands of clicks with low conversion vs campaigns with fewer clicks but higher user engagement. A few things stood out to me:
Premium traffic usually behaves differently:
- They stay on the page longer
- They click through more internal pages
- They start filling forms before deciding
- They return to the site within the next day or two
Meanwhile, low-intent traffic shows the opposite:
- High bounce rate
- Low time on site
- Little or no follow-through
- Lots of one-second visits
I also noticed that some traffic sources are simply built for volume, not quality. They send users who click accidentally, have no interest, or are just flipping through ads. Cheap traffic looks attractive until you realise it never pays you back. The painful learning phase
I had campaigns where people came in and bounced within three seconds. I changed the headline, changed the CTA, made the landing page shorter, made it longer, tried different images – none of it helped. That’s when it hit me: I was optimising the wrong part of the puzzle.
Someone told me once, “You can’t polish low-intent traffic and turn it into buyers.” And they were right. No amount of funnel tweaking can save a campaign where the audience simply doesn’t care. What finally helped
So, I changed how I approached testing. Instead of focusing on cost per click, I started thinking in terms of cost per quality user. You’d be surprised how different those numbers look. A more expensive click from a highly interested user ends up being much cheaper in the long run because the campaign doesn’t keep draining budget endlessly.
I also spent time reading and comparing insights from people who had gone through the same thing. One resource that helped me understand the difference in a more structured way was this post:
Spot Premium vs Low-Intent Traffic to Promote Dating Offers
It doesn’t magically solve the problem, but it helped confirm what I was already noticing based on my results: the source matters just as much as the offer, if not more. Signals I look for now
Nothing scientific – just practical habits I’ve built over time:
1. Early engagement metrics
If 80% of users leave before three seconds, I already know something is wrong with the traffic source, not necessarily the funnel.
2. Repeated clicks from the same user
Returning visitors usually mean real interest. Premium traffic tends to have more of these.
3. Conversion-assisted events
Even if they don’t buy immediately, high-intent users usually do things like scroll deep, interact with buttons, or start a sign-up process.
4. Placement transparency
I now prefer sources that tell me where the traffic is coming from. Blind sources often send junk I can’t evaluate.
5. Gradual scale instead of instant bursts
If a campaign suddenly floods with traffic the second I start it, I get cautious. Quality traffic usually builds at a normal pace, not in chaotic spikes. Not perfect, but better
Even now, I still get campaigns where the quality feels mixed. But I’m burning less budget and getting more consistent results because I’m not chasing raw click volume anymore.
If anyone here is struggling with dating campaigns that feel like they should be converting but aren’t, I’d seriously recommend stepping back and analysing:
Is it the funnel, or is it the audience?
From my experience, nine times out of ten, it was the traffic – not the offer – holding things back.
