Tweet
Anyone tried finance advertising to improve lead quality?
Lately I’ve been thinking a lot about why some finance ads seem to bring in good leads while others just attract people who never follow through. It’s one of those things you don’t really notice until you’ve wasted a bit of money and start wondering if you’re doing something wrong. That’s basically how I ended up digging into Finance Advertising more than I ever planned to.
At first, I assumed that throwing ads out there—Google, socials, whatever—would automatically bring in “serious” leads. I mean, if someone clicks on something related to finance, they must be interested, right? Turns out… not really. A good chunk of people click just out of curiosity, or because they thought the ad was about something totally different. So, I kept asking myself: Why are the leads so random? And how do people actually get better quality leads in finance ads?
My biggest pain point was that the leads coming in didn’t match the type of users I was trying to reach. I wanted folks who were genuinely looking for solutions, not people browsing during lunch break because the ad “looked interesting.” It got frustrating because every time I checked the numbers, I saw traffic but barely any real conversations or conversions. I even questioned if the whole idea of improving lead quality in finance ads was realistic or just something people say online.
After a while, I started experimenting—nothing fancy, just small tweaks. One thing I learned quickly is that people in the finance space don’t respond well to flashy or vague ads. If your ad sounds like you’re making promises, they scroll right past it. Someone told me that finance audiences like clarity, so I tried being more specific in what the ad was actually offering. Surprisingly, that alone reduced the number of random clicks.
Another thing I played around with was audience filtering. I didn’t even know how much difference it could make. For example, people who search for “investment tips” behave so differently from users searching for “loan comparison” or “credit improvement steps.” I used to lump them together thinking “finance is finance,” but that ended up watering down the entire campaign. Once I separated the groups, the clicks from each type of user actually started to make more sense.
I also tested different landing page styles—some short, some long, some with visuals, some without. Funny enough, the simple ones worked better. When people are already thinking about money, they don’t want to read long stories or scroll through fancy designs. They want straight-up answers. I noticed that when the landing page matched the tone of the ad, the leads were more serious and stuck around longer.
There was one moment where everything clicked (no pun intended). I came across a discussion online where someone mentioned that the trick is not to chase more leads but to chase clearer intent. That hit me because I realized I had been chasing volume the entire time. So I changed two small things:
● I made the ad messaging more focused on the actual problem the user might have.
● I stopped trying to talk to “everyone interested in finance.”
The shift wasn’t instant, but the quality definitely improved. I’m not saying it magically solved everything, but the leads I got afterward were noticeably more engaged. They actually read the info, asked questions, and followed through. That alone made me feel like maybe I wasn’t doing everything wrong.
Eventually, while reading through different sources and random forum posts, I stumbled on this page that talks about the same thing in a simple way without overhyping it. Sharing it here because someone else might find it helpful too: Proven Finance Advertising Strategies to Improve Lead Quality
I’m not saying it’s some magic resource, but it matched a lot of what I observed from my own testing. Sometimes just hearing someone else break it down casually is enough to help you figure out what you’re missing.
If I had to share one soft takeaway from everything I’ve tried, it would be this: don’t assume the problem is your budget or your platform. Sometimes it’s just that your message is talking to the wrong crowd, or it’s not clear enough for the right crowd. Finance users are picky—sometimes in a good way. They pretty much tell you what they want through their behavior; you just have to notice it.
So yeah, if anyone else is dealing with weird lead quality issues in finance ads, you’re not alone. It’s kind of a puzzle, but once you start adjusting the small stuff, things slowly begin to make sense. And honestly, that feels way better than thinking the whole system is broken.
At first, I assumed that throwing ads out there—Google, socials, whatever—would automatically bring in “serious” leads. I mean, if someone clicks on something related to finance, they must be interested, right? Turns out… not really. A good chunk of people click just out of curiosity, or because they thought the ad was about something totally different. So, I kept asking myself: Why are the leads so random? And how do people actually get better quality leads in finance ads?
My biggest pain point was that the leads coming in didn’t match the type of users I was trying to reach. I wanted folks who were genuinely looking for solutions, not people browsing during lunch break because the ad “looked interesting.” It got frustrating because every time I checked the numbers, I saw traffic but barely any real conversations or conversions. I even questioned if the whole idea of improving lead quality in finance ads was realistic or just something people say online.
After a while, I started experimenting—nothing fancy, just small tweaks. One thing I learned quickly is that people in the finance space don’t respond well to flashy or vague ads. If your ad sounds like you’re making promises, they scroll right past it. Someone told me that finance audiences like clarity, so I tried being more specific in what the ad was actually offering. Surprisingly, that alone reduced the number of random clicks.
Another thing I played around with was audience filtering. I didn’t even know how much difference it could make. For example, people who search for “investment tips” behave so differently from users searching for “loan comparison” or “credit improvement steps.” I used to lump them together thinking “finance is finance,” but that ended up watering down the entire campaign. Once I separated the groups, the clicks from each type of user actually started to make more sense.
I also tested different landing page styles—some short, some long, some with visuals, some without. Funny enough, the simple ones worked better. When people are already thinking about money, they don’t want to read long stories or scroll through fancy designs. They want straight-up answers. I noticed that when the landing page matched the tone of the ad, the leads were more serious and stuck around longer.
There was one moment where everything clicked (no pun intended). I came across a discussion online where someone mentioned that the trick is not to chase more leads but to chase clearer intent. That hit me because I realized I had been chasing volume the entire time. So I changed two small things:
● I made the ad messaging more focused on the actual problem the user might have.
● I stopped trying to talk to “everyone interested in finance.”
The shift wasn’t instant, but the quality definitely improved. I’m not saying it magically solved everything, but the leads I got afterward were noticeably more engaged. They actually read the info, asked questions, and followed through. That alone made me feel like maybe I wasn’t doing everything wrong.
Eventually, while reading through different sources and random forum posts, I stumbled on this page that talks about the same thing in a simple way without overhyping it. Sharing it here because someone else might find it helpful too: Proven Finance Advertising Strategies to Improve Lead Quality
I’m not saying it’s some magic resource, but it matched a lot of what I observed from my own testing. Sometimes just hearing someone else break it down casually is enough to help you figure out what you’re missing.
If I had to share one soft takeaway from everything I’ve tried, it would be this: don’t assume the problem is your budget or your platform. Sometimes it’s just that your message is talking to the wrong crowd, or it’s not clear enough for the right crowd. Finance users are picky—sometimes in a good way. They pretty much tell you what they want through their behavior; you just have to notice it.
So yeah, if anyone else is dealing with weird lead quality issues in finance ads, you’re not alone. It’s kind of a puzzle, but once you start adjusting the small stuff, things slowly begin to make sense. And honestly, that feels way better than thinking the whole system is broken.
